“That is like the prime example of an asset that structurally and strategically can be really additive to a portfolio when these are the types of events that are going to drive risk-off moments in markets,” Manoukian added. Aversion from investors may arise due to the esoteric nature of the assets, Manoukian added, and as it’s harder to understand it’s therefore harder to access.
В Черном море атакован танкер европейской страны14:35
。业内人士推荐吃瓜网作为进阶阅读
Желающей общаться с сыном-бойцом СВО россиянке отказались проводить интернет08:45
The other is the substitution model, where, within a new trinity of “nuclear technology-space technology-information (AI) technology,” the subordinate relationship between space technology and strategic forces transforms into a parallel relationship. This examines how space technology can substitute for nuclear technology in exerting relatively independent strategic capabilities and deterrence functions, thereby impacting outer space strategic stability and broader military strategic stability. First, from the perspective of the latest developments in space equipment and weapon systems, it assesses the impact of advanced technologies like space-based laser weapons, space-based missile defense technologies, cyber anti-satellite technologies, and nuclear-powered satellites on global strategic stability. Scholars have analyzed the potential impacts of these new space equipment or weapon concepts on outer space strategic stability.6 Second, from the perspective of space equipment or weapon system deployment methods, it analyzes how differences in space force deployment, use, and specific operations impact strategic stability. Some scholars have discussed how the deployment of large satellite constellations reshapes the space offense-defense operational structure and the resulting strategic stability implications.7 Third, from the perspective of potential adversaries and their power structures in space confrontation, it reveals how factors like strategic culture, offense-defense preferences, and security interests affect strategic stability. Scholars have noted that asymmetric development of space technology among strategic adversaries could lead to misjudgments, escalations, and strategic instability.8